iBelieve.com Forums
iBelieve Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
  Sponsor

Proof or NOT? THE MOON

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> Proof or NOT? THE MOON
Jump to post #:
Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/21/2008 8:30:48 AM   
Fortydays

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 4/24/2008
Status: offline
NASA SCIENTISTS HELP TO PROVE THE BIBLE
Before the first manned moon mission, I heard scientists on the radio and TV say that "if no evidence of life is found on the moon, science will have to go completely back to the drawing board in our study of the origin of the universe". But, the Lunar probes found no evidence of life on the moon, it was sterile. But, has science "gone back to the drawing board"? I don't think so.


A discovery on the first moon mission PROVED, instead of disproved, God's Word. Dr. Henry Morris, a scientist who is a Bible believing Christian, said that scientists expected the moon to have about 22 feet of "moon dust" on its surface. Objects in space are said to attract cosmic "dust" at a rate determined by the density of their atmosphere and the "age" of the object. NASA scientists used a formula to determine the thickness of the moons dust, and they used so many "millions of years" for the age of the moon. If you remember, the Lunar Lander had huge flat feet, so it wouldn't sink into the "moon dust", and guess what, the feet went "clunk", in just a few inches of moon dust.
Dr. Morris then used NASA's own formula and worked it BACKWARDS with the moon's correct "inches of dust", and solved for the moon's "AGE". The astonishing answer, using NASA's own formula, was that the moon calculates to be about 7000 years old!
We have no way of knowing the age of the original earth, but we do know the approximate age of the moon from Scripture. The Hebrew in Genesis 1:1 states that the original earth was "created" (Hebrew "barah"), or brought into being from non existent materials. But, in Genesis 1:2, the earth was then "made to become an empty wasteland", we think due to the fall of Satan. Isaiah 45:18 says that the original earth was NOT created a void, or wasteland, but it was brought into being to be inhabited.


God cannot create junk, everything He CREATES is PERFECT! The original earth, Satan and all the angels, the garden of Eden, and Adam and EVE were ALL created perfect. The sin, sickness, imperfections and disasters we see today are a result of Satans fall and the disobedience of Adam and Eve. God cannot "create" sinful human beings like you and I, He obtained us through human procreation, from fallen Adam and Eve. The rest of Genesis 1:14 through Genesis chapter 2 verses 1 and 2 describe how God took the EXISTING materials of His ORIGINAL creation, and "formed" them into a RESTORED Earth, prepared for Adam and Eve.
God may have created the original earth millions of years ago, we don't know, BUT, God placed the moon in the sky on the FOURTH day of the RESTORATION, in Genesis 1:14-19. Adding up the Scripture genealogy from Adam to Jesus totals about 4000, and if we add our 2000 years from the birth of Christ, we are approximately 6000 years from Adam. NASA's formula, and the actual thickness of the moon dust proves that the Creation account in Genesis is LITERALLY CORRECT! Adam and Eve and our sun and moon were created approximately 6000 years ago!

http://www.biblefood.com/biblepage8.html
Post #: 1
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/21/2008 9:10:51 AM   
iluvatar


Posts: 1931
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fortydays

NASA SCIENTISTS HELP TO PROVE THE BIBLE
Before the first manned moon mission, I heard scientists on the radio and TV say that "if no evidence of life is found on the moon, science will have to go completely back to the drawing board in our study of the origin of the universe". But, the Lunar probes found no evidence of life on the moon, it was sterile. But, has science "gone back to the drawing board"? I don't think so.


Actually, they have. The theory of lunar formation currently most popular is that the moon is a result of an impact between the earth and some other body: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis This wasn't proposed until 1974.

quote:


A discovery on the first moon mission PROVED, instead of disproved, God's Word. Dr. Henry Morris, a scientist who is a Bible believing Christian, said that scientists expected the moon to have about 22 feet of "moon dust" on its surface. Objects in space are said to attract cosmic "dust" at a rate determined by the density of their atmosphere and the "age" of the object. NASA scientists used a formula to determine the thickness of the moons dust, and they used so many "millions of years" for the age of the moon. If you remember, the Lunar Lander had huge flat feet, so it wouldn't sink into the "moon dust", and guess what, the feet went "clunk", in just a few inches of moon dust.
Dr. Morris then used NASA's own formula and worked it BACKWARDS with the moon's correct "inches of dust", and solved for the moon's "AGE". The astonishing answer, using NASA's own formula, was that the moon calculates to be about 7000 years old!
We have no way of knowing the age of the original earth, but we do know the approximate age of the moon from Scripture. The Hebrew in Genesis 1:1 states that the original earth was "created" (Hebrew "barah"), or brought into being from non existent materials. But, in Genesis 1:2, the earth was then "made to become an empty wasteland", we think due to the fall of Satan. Isaiah 45:18 says that the original earth was NOT created a void, or wasteland, but it was brought into being to be inhabited.


Henry Morris was wrong. Even AIG says so: http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i4/moondust.asp

quote:


God cannot create junk, everything He CREATES is PERFECT! The original earth, Satan and all the angels, the garden of Eden, and Adam and EVE were ALL created perfect. The sin, sickness, imperfections and disasters we see today are a result of Satans fall and the disobedience of Adam and Eve. God cannot "create" sinful human beings like you and I, He obtained us through human procreation, from fallen Adam and Eve. The rest of Genesis 1:14 through Genesis chapter 2 verses 1 and 2 describe how God took the EXISTING materials of His ORIGINAL creation, and "formed" them into a RESTORED Earth, prepared for Adam and Eve.
God may have created the original earth millions of years ago, we don't know, BUT, God placed the moon in the sky on the FOURTH day of the RESTORATION, in Genesis 1:14-19. Adding up the Scripture genealogy from Adam to Jesus totals about 4000, and if we add our 2000 years from the birth of Christ, we are approximately 6000 years from Adam. NASA's formula, and the actual thickness of the moon dust proves that the Creation account in Genesis is LITERALLY CORRECT! Adam and Eve and our sun and moon were created approximately 6000 years ago!


Head on over to the science forum to find a whole list of reasons why scientists and many Christians don't believe this is the case.

-Dan.

_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 2
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/21/2008 9:17:29 AM   
bluestone


Posts: 2934
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: United States of America
Status: offline
I believe the moon exists. That is where cheese comes from.

_____________________________

I need Christ. Not something that resembles Christ.
Post #: 3
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/21/2008 10:20:24 AM   
Fortydays

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 4/24/2008
Status: offline
Sorry...I do believe this topic i have posted is in the wrong forum...
Post #: 4
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/21/2008 11:04:09 AM   
MindySue69


Posts: 321
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bluestone

I believe the moon exists. That is where cheese comes from.


Exactly! The little man makes it.
Post #: 5
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/21/2008 8:04:09 PM   
Kath


Posts: 17223
Joined: 2/28/2005
Status: offline
moving from General Faith to Science and Origins
Post #: 6
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/23/2008 10:54:25 AM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3159
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Henry Morris was wrong. Even AIG says so
Come on, Dan, you know better than that! The fact is that Dr Morris used NASA's own preliminary estimates of moon dust acculmulation rates to arrive at an age < 10,000 years old. Obviously, it was the uniformitarian naturalist approach that proved wrong when the Lander found mere inches of dust. AiG is rightfully pointing out that incorrect estimates based on faulty assumptions make for poor science!

quote:

Head on over to the science forum to find a whole list of reasons why scientists and many Christians don't believe this is the case.
Head on over to the science forum to find a whole list of reasons why all godless scientists and many Christians who should know better prefer to accept fallible human "science" over inerrant divine historical fact.

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 7
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/23/2008 11:23:40 AM   
iluvatar


Posts: 1931
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

quote:

Henry Morris was wrong. Even AIG says so
Come on, Dan, you know better than that! The fact is that Dr Morris used NASA's own preliminary estimates of moon dust acculmulation rates to arrive at an age < 10,000 years old. Obviously, it was the uniformitarian naturalist approach that proved wrong when the Lander found mere inches of dust.


No, it was the initial measurement that proved to be wrong, not the uniformitarian assumption. That's the whole point of this article - uniformitarian assumptions, in this case, DON'T disprove an old earth.

And it wasn't when the Eagle landed that we discovered that there was little moon dust. Observations of the moon throughout the 60's suggested that there wasn't much to worry about and when Surveyor I landed in '66, it was confirmed. Further observations made before the writing of Morris' book showed that the influx of dust was actually several orders of magnitude lower than Petterson's initial estimate.

Morris was wrong.

quote:

AiG is rightfully pointing out that incorrect estimates based on faulty assumptions make for poor science!


That's right - mainstream science continued to reanalyze the data and, rightfully, concluded THAT there wasn't enough moon dust to worry about and WHY there wasn't enough moon dust to worry about. YEC apologists, however, used obsolete data to confirm their faulty assumption that the earth is only 6000 years old, ignoring not only science that had ALREADY disproven their contention, but ongoing work that continued that trend. So yes, YEC was promoting bad science.

-Dan.

_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 8
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/23/2008 11:43:36 AM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3159
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

No, it was the initial measurement that proved to be wrong, not the uniformitarian assumption.
Good grief, Dan, nothing was "measured" until Armstrong touched the surface. I really don't have time to play semantic games. If you wish to defame Dr Morris, that's your problem, er privelege.

While searching for some references for my response, I ran across this article on The Moon Dust Argument. I link it as a sincere gesture of fair balance and since I know none of the protagonists personally, I have no axe to grind. Your point is correct - the depth of moon dust neither proves nor disproves YE or OE chronology.

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 9
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/23/2008 1:15:39 PM   
iluvatar


Posts: 1931
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

quote:

No, it was the initial measurement that proved to be wrong, not the uniformitarian assumption.
Good grief, Dan, nothing was "measured" until Armstrong touched the surface.


There were plenty of measurements taken before then - by radar systems, by satellites, and by lunar probes.

This article on AIG's web site is actually the most complete description I've found (by far) describing what was known when. It's pretty long and laid out strangely, but worth the read.

quote:

If you wish to defame Dr Morris, that's your problem, er privelege.


Is it defaming someone to show that their statements and the information on which those statements were based were wrong?

-Dan.

_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 10
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/23/2008 9:20:22 PM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3159
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

There were plenty of measurements taken before then - by radar systems, by satellites, and by lunar probes.
Here's an interesting vignette from the Snelling article you linked above:

quote:

Finally, there is the testimony of Dr William Overn. Because he was working at the time for the Univac Division of Sperry Rand on the television sub-system for the Mariner IV spacecraft he sometimes had exchanges with the men at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) who were working on the Apollo program. Evidently those he spoke to were assigned to the Ranger spacecraft missions which, as we have seen, were designed to find out what the lunar surface really was like; in other words, to investigate among other things whether there was a thin or thick dust layer on the lunar surface. In Bill’s own words:

‘I simply told them that they should expect to find less than 10,000 years’ worth of dust when they got there. This was based on my creationist belief that the moon is young. The situation got so tense it was suggested I bet them a large amount of money about the dust. … However, when the Surveyor spacecraft later landed on the moon and discovered there was virtually no dust, that wasn’t good enough for these people to pay off their bet. They said the first landing might have been a fluke in a low dust area! So we waited until ,.,. astronauts actually landed on the moon.'


Apparently uniformitarian scientists hold onto their religion as long as possible, even in the face of "plenty of measurements"!

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 11
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/23/2008 11:03:56 PM   
iluvatar


Posts: 1931
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

quote:


‘I simply told them that they should expect to find less than 10,000 years’ worth of dust when they got there. This was based on my creationist belief that the moon is young. The situation got so tense it was suggested I bet them a large amount of money about the dust. … However, when the Surveyor spacecraft later landed on the moon and discovered there was virtually no dust, that wasn’t good enough for these people to pay off their bet. They said the first landing might have been a fluke in a low dust area! So we waited until ,.,. astronauts actually landed on the moon.'


Apparently uniformitarian scientists hold onto their religion as long as possible, even in the face of "plenty of measurements"!


(edited by Moderator to remove personal attack)

First, that wasn't "plenty of measurements." That was one, and at that time - one without a vetted explanation. Second, they had good reason to be skeptical of the proposed reason (YEC) for the lack of dust - many other lines of scientific evidence pointed towards an old universe.

And wouldn't ya know it, they were right. They waited until conclusive data was in, which ultimately showed that the initial estimates for dust influx were wrong and that shallow dust layers are consistent with an old universe.

-Dan.

< Message edited by Consecrated2God -- 8/24/2008 8:36:18 AM >


_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 12
RE: Proof or NOT? THE MOON - 8/24/2008 9:03:14 AM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3159
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

And wouldn't ya know it, they were right. They waited until conclusive data was in, which ultimately showed that the initial estimates for dust influx were wrong and that shallow dust layers are consistent with an old universe.
And wouldn't ya know it, Morris and the YEC crowd were right. They anticipated the conclusive data based on the historical narrative Account, and the data ultimately showed that the initial estimates for dust influx were wrong and that shallow dust layers are consistent with a young universe. (That's for fair balance!)

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> Proof or NOT? THE MOON
Jump to post #:
Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


iBelieve Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

iBelieve.com is a proud member of the Salem Web Network of sites including:

CCMmagazine.com | ChristianJobs.com | ChurchStaffing.com | Crosscards.com | CrossDaily.com | Crosswalk.com | LightSource.com | OnePlace.com | SermonSearch.com | TheFish.com | XulonPress.com | YouthWorkerJournal.com
Enjoy the websites of these iBelieve.com Sponsors:

Bibles.com | BibleLeague.org | ChristianBook.com | EHarmony.com | Gospel for Asia | LifewayStores.com | Campus Crusade for Christ | Townhall.com | Billygraham.org

© Copyright 2006, iBelieve.com. All rights reserved.

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI