RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpretation
View related threads:
(in this forum
| in all forums)
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 10/26/2007 10:16:12 PM
|
|
|
bettymackII
Posts: 1424
Joined: 4/28/2007
Status: offline
|
Try typing Margaret MacDonald.The one on this thread is typed Margaret McDonald.
|
|
|
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 10/26/2007 10:25:49 PM
|
|
|
DanBryan
Posts: 28
Joined: 7/21/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bettymackII I have been doing some research on this Margaret Macdonald.She was never a member of Edward Irving's church and I have not found anywhere that she ever attended his church. Here is an indication that Margaret did attend the Irving's church. If I find more I will let you know. You will see a reference in the 3rd paragraph. http://roxborogh.com/1830charismatics.htm Thanks, dan
|
|
|
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 11/28/2007 6:38:13 PM
|
|
|
bettymackII
Posts: 1424
Joined: 4/28/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DanBryan quote:
ORIGINAL: bettymackII I have been doing some research on this Margaret Macdonald.She was never a member of Edward Irving's church and I have not found anywhere that she ever attended his church. Here is an indication that Margaret did attend the Irving's church. If I find more I will let you know. You will see a reference in the 3rd paragraph. http://roxborogh.com/1830charismatics.htm Thanks, dan Yes, your source says that she did attend Irving's church. I have understood that Margaret Macdonald was very sick and was not known to leave her home let alone attend a church including Irving's I have read a book, The Rapture Plot by Dave MacPherson which has done a incredible research on the history of the pre-tribulation rapture.
|
|
|
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 8/14/2008 6:17:56 PM
|
|
|
bettymackII
Posts: 1424
Joined: 4/28/2007
Status: offline
|
I would like to know if the new members of this message board are aware of Margaret MacDonald and her connection to the pre-tribulation rapture's origin. Some say it started with John Darby and some are not aware of either MM or JD. The question is who do you know originated the thought of some of the church being removed before the Great Tribulation? A. Margaret MacDonald B. John Darby C. I don't know This could be quite interesting and quick if our replies are one of the three answers. I will start by answering with the letter A
|
|
|
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 8/14/2008 9:59:47 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1970
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
John Darby picked up on the vision that Margaret had in the 1830's and things built from there. Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 8/18/2008 11:59:50 AM
|
|
|
stolar1962
Posts: 34
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
to bad you ignore that the rapture concept predates Darby and MacDonald an article from lamblion.com on the origins of pretrib rapture: The Origin of the Concept of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture From Man or the Bible? by Dr. David R. Reagan Paul N. Benware, in his book, Understanding End Times Prophecy, notes that many writers in the 17th and 18th Centuries began to speak of a Rapture separate and apart from the Second Coming:3 "Peter Jurieu in his book, Approaching Deliverance of the Church (1687) taught that Christ would come in the air to rapture the saints and return to Heaven before the battle of Armageddon... Philip Doddridge's commentary on the New Testament (1738) and John Gill's commentary on the New Testament (1748) both use the term rapture and speak of it as imminent. It is clear these men believed that this coming will precede Christ's descent to the earth and the time of judgment. The purpose was to preserve believers from the time of judgment. James Macknight (1763) and Thomas Scott (1792) taught that the righteous will be carried to heaven, where they will be secure until the time of judgment is over." Tommy Ice, the director of the Pre-Trib Research Center, asserts that the first person to spell out in detail the idea that the Rapture would occur before the Tribulation begins was a Baptist leader named Morgan Edwards.4 This remarkable man was born in Wales and preached at churches in England and Ireland before emigrating to the United States in 1761 to become pastor of a church in Philadelphia. He proceeded to become the founder of Brown University and was recognized as the leading Baptist historian of his day. As early as the 1740's Edwards was espousing a pre-tribulational viewpoint in his writings about eschatology. The difference in his view and the modern Pre-Trib concept is that he believed the Rapture would occur in the middle of Daniel's 70th week, about 3 1/2 years before the Second Coming." one more historiclal reference is Ephraim the Syrain - a letter attributed to hem displayed the pretrib concept in the 4th century. there is some controversy as to the real author, and the time frame is anywhere from the 4th to the 6th centuries, over 1,000 years before Darby. Pre Trib rapture and millennianism almost vanished from the scene due to a switch in intrepretive methods from literal to allegorical. The allegorical/spiritual method was supreme until the puritans started using literal interpretation again .
|
|
|
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 8/18/2008 12:09:07 PM
|
|
|
bob97
Posts: 1970
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
|
quote:
As early as the 1740's Edwards was espousing a pre-tribulational viewpoint in his writings about eschatology. The difference in his view and the modern Pre-Trib concept is that he believed the Rapture would occur in the middle of Daniel's 70th week, about 3 1/2 years before the Second Coming." One must understand the difference between a pre-tribulation rapture and a pre-wrath rapture...there is a vast difference. People still assume that the full week is tribulation of God rather than tribulation by the Antichrist. God allows the tribulation to come about but His wrath comes towards the latter part of the week. Those of Christ will not experience the wrath of God. Bob
_____________________________
The LORD clears the road for me! The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
|
|
|
|
RE: Margaret McDonald’s vision or John Darby's Interpre... - 8/18/2008 4:47:32 PM
|
|
|
bettymackII
Posts: 1424
Joined: 4/28/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: stolar1962 to bad you ignore that the rapture concept predates Darby and MacDonald an article from lamblion.com on the origins of pretrib rapture: The Origin of the Concept of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture From Man or the Bible? by Dr. David R. Reagan Paul N. Benware, in his book, Understanding End Times Prophecy, notes that many writers in the 17th and 18th Centuries began to speak of a Rapture separate and apart from the Second Coming:3 "Peter Jurieu in his book, Approaching Deliverance of the Church (1687) taught that Christ would come in the air to rapture the saints and return to Heaven before the battle of Armageddon... Philip Doddridge's commentary on the New Testament (1738) and John Gill's commentary on the New Testament (1748) both use the term rapture and speak of it as imminent. It is clear these men believed that this coming will precede Christ's descent to the earth and the time of judgment. The purpose was to preserve believers from the time of judgment. James Macknight (1763) and Thomas Scott (1792) taught that the righteous will be carried to heaven, where they will be secure until the time of judgment is over." Tommy Ice, the director of the Pre-Trib Research Center, asserts that the first person to spell out in detail the idea that the Rapture would occur before the Tribulation begins was a Baptist leader named Morgan Edwards.4 This remarkable man was born in Wales and preached at churches in England and Ireland before emigrating to the United States in 1761 to become pastor of a church in Philadelphia. He proceeded to become the founder of Brown University and was recognized as the leading Baptist historian of his day. As early as the 1740's Edwards was espousing a pre-tribulational viewpoint in his writings about eschatology. The difference in his view and the modern Pre-Trib concept is that he believed the Rapture would occur in the middle of Daniel's 70th week, about 3 1/2 years before the Second Coming." one more historiclal reference is Ephraim the Syrain - a letter attributed to hem displayed the pretrib concept in the 4th century. there is some controversy as to the real author, and the time frame is anywhere from the 4th to the 6th centuries, over 1,000 years before Darby. Pre Trib rapture and millennianism almost vanished from the scene due to a switch in intrepretive methods from literal to allegorical. The allegorical/spiritual method was supreme until the puritans started using literal interpretation again . I've noticed that David Reagan likes to rewrite Jeffrey, Ice and some other pretrib promoters - but he seems to have trouble doing the simple task of copying them correctly. For further light on the qualifications of the promoters to speak authoritatively about church history (and especially pretrib dispensationalism), Google or Yahoo "Walvoord's Posttrib Varieties - Plus," "Open Letter to Todd Strandberg," "Humbug Huebner," "Wily Jeffrey," "LaHaye's Temperament," "The Unoriginal John Darby," "Thomas Ice (Hired Gun)," "Thomas Ice (Bloopers)," "The Rapture Index (Mad Theology)," "Deceiving and Being Deceived" (especially the latter part), "Pretrib Rapture Diehards," and "Revisers of Pretrib Rapture History." These were authored by journalist/historian Dave MacPherson, author of the bestselling book "The Rapture Plot," now carried by Armageddon Books. His research has been endorsed by a galaxy of evangelical greats (Google "Scholars Weigh My Research"), none of whom has had an axe to grind either for or against pretrib. Pretrib promoters, on the other hand, seem to get kudos from mainly other pretrib promoters! Reagan, BTW, has been saying things about MacPherson's books that even most other pretribs don't dare to say; for example, he claims that MacPherson merely keeps issuing his one-note message with different titles to make it appear that he has something brand-new to say when he really doesn't. But this is nonsense. His first two books, which focused on and had photos of historical places in Britain relative to pretrib rapture history, were combined in one book "The Incredible Cover-up." His book "The Great Rapture Hoax" has a 55-page appendix analyzing basically every word in Margaret Macdonald's now-famous 1830 pretrib revelation - that is, not an extra-Biblical "vision" but actually her interpretation of Scripture; the same book has 16 pages of short quotes from past Christian leaders (from the first century to the 19th century) showing their views of Antichrist, the rapture, tribulation etc. His 300-page book "The Rapture Plot" is the never-before-told discovery of the 19th century plot to quietly steal credit for pretribulationism away from an obscure British group and give it posthumously to Darby - the "mother of all revisionisms" that no other writer had ever written about because the revisionism had been cleverly covered up inside British libraries as well as secretive British sects! His next book "The Three R's" revealed more long-covered-up data showing how early pretribbers had based their theory on even astrology and pyramidology. It's obvious that Reagan has merely copied other smears of MacPherson and given them more twists than anyone else. It seems that many folks are too busy or lazy to do their own research and find it easier to rewrite and repeat others - but the Word says that someday we shall all give an account to God for every careless word we have uttered! (PS - Although certain promoters have lately tried to dredge up certain INDIVIDUALS in past centuries whom they label "pretrib" simply because those individuals merely mentioned the "catching up" without any reference to Antichrist or the tribulation (!) - again, see MacPherson's web piece "Deceiving and Being Deceived" - absolutely NO ONE has ever found any organized church or official Christian theology before 1830 that ever taught it! Talk about desperation so that their theory can continue to be part of American merchandising!)
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|