iBelieve.com Forums
iBelieve Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
  Sponsor

Uniformitarianism

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> Uniformitarianism
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Uniformitarianism - 8/19/2008 5:35:37 PM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
This is a continuation of a discussion moving off topic in another thread.

DrMark said:
quote:


Been there, done that, drj! You misunderstand me so I will clarify. The evidence is all the same. One's interpretation of the evidence based on preconceived assumptions leads to conclusions. Robust evidence supports YE chronology - it's been presented in numerous threads besides yours. You choose to interpret it through your religion of uniformitarian naturalism. I'm sorry you cannot accept this simple fact.


So you reject uniformitarianism.. but it sounds like you would agree that current evidence, research etc would support the prevailing scientific theories regarding the age of the earth, evolution, etc IF one accepted the premise of uniformitarianism. With-in that framework, do the prevailing scientific theories make sense?

Furthermore, to open up the topic to others as well... do you accept uniformitarianism? Why or why not?
Post #: 1
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/19/2008 5:40:53 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
I think drmark is simply a uniformitarianantiestablishmentarian-contrarian, not anti-uniformitarianist per se.

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 2
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/19/2008 6:14:48 PM   
drj11

 

Posts: 632
Joined: 3/29/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

I think drmark is simply a uniformitarianantiestablishmentarian-contrarian, not anti-uniformitarianist per se.


I'm all for anti-establishment (if there's good reason for it), but creationism is arguably just as 'establishment' as evolution.
Post #: 3
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/19/2008 6:17:27 PM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3143
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I'm all for anti-establishment, but creationism is arguably just as 'establishment' as evolution.
Absolutely correct, drj! The only difference is the veracity of the establishment.

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 4
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 4:19:14 AM   
BVZ

 

Posts: 359
Joined: 11/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

quote:

I'm all for anti-establishment, but creationism is arguably just as 'establishment' as evolution.
Absolutely correct, drj! The only difference is the veracity of the establishment.


Could you please stop stating your opinion as fact? It is irritating.

On the topic: Creationists reject anything that would force them out of thier comfort zone if they have to acept it. Interestingly, they often accept that the laws of nature are constant if it suits them.
Post #: 5
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 8:12:16 AM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3143
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Could you please stop stating your opinion as fact? It is irritating.
I'm sure it is to you - 1 Cor 1:18-19. You see BVZ, we Believers on a Christian discussion forum know the difference between opinion and fact!

quote:

On the topic: Creationists reject anything that would force them out of thier comfort zone if they have to acept it. Interestingly, they often accept that the laws of nature are constant if it suits them.
Actually, the topic is uniformitarianism so your statement should read:

On the topic: Uniformitarians reject anything that would force them out of thier comfort zone if they have to acept it. Interestingly, they often accept that the laws of nature are inconstant if it suits them.

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 6
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 8:38:43 AM   
iluvatar


Posts: 1964
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark
On the topic: Uniformitarians reject anything that would force them out of thier comfort zone if they have to acept it. Interestingly, they often accept that the laws of nature are inconstant if it suits them.


What laws of nature would those be and in which cases does it suit us for them to be inconstant?

-Dan.

_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 7
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 9:53:35 AM   
drmark

 

Posts: 3143
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

What laws of nature would those be and in which cases does it suit us for them to be inconstant?
The most obvious one is entropy which must be suspended by evolutionists for life to evolve more complex forms over zillions of years. And no, I won't be responding to the tired old "closed/open system" debate if you wish to raise it.

_____________________________

Jeremiah 31:31-34. The time is NOW, fellow saints!
Post #: 8
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 10:09:36 AM   
essentialsaltes


Posts: 1062
Joined: 10/14/2007
From: Inglewood, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

quote:

What laws of nature would those be and in which cases does it suit us for them to be inconstant?
The most obvious one is entropy which must be suspended by evolutionists for life to evolve more complex forms over zillions of years. And no, I won't be responding to the tired old "closed/open system" debate if you wish to raise it.


There is no debate. The Second Law only applies to closed systems. Living creatures (or the biosphere, or the surface of the earth) is not a closed system. Your statement is just wrong. If it were true, zygotes could not become babies, and living things would quickly die of energy hunger.

_____________________________

"My object in all arguments is not to make any preconceived opinion of mine seem right, but merely to discover and establish the truth, whatever the truth may be."

-- HP Lovecraft, letter to Robert E. Howard 7/27-28/34
Post #: 9
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 10:31:57 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

There is no debate. The Second Law only applies to closed systems. Living creatures (or the biosphere, or the surface of the earth) is not a closed system. Your statement is just wrong. If it were true, zygotes could not become babies, and living things would quickly die of energy hunger.


Well, no it doesn't 'only apply to closed systems' - it applies differently for closed and open systems. Either way, the application of energy to a system is irrelevant if that energy isn't utilized in a way that allows it to do work.

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 10
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 11:46:37 AM   
essentialsaltes


Posts: 1062
Joined: 10/14/2007
From: Inglewood, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

There is no debate. The Second Law only applies to closed systems. Living creatures (or the biosphere, or the surface of the earth) is not a closed system. Your statement is just wrong. If it were true, zygotes could not become babies, and living things would quickly die of energy hunger.


Well, no it doesn't 'only apply to closed systems' - it applies differently for closed and open systems. Either way, the application of energy to a system is irrelevant if that energy isn't utilized in a way that allows it to do work.


Although there are several different formulations of the Second Law, they are all equivalent. The one relevant to drmark's remark is:

"The entropy of an isolated system which is not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium."

Other formulations of the second law, such as "heat flows from hot to cool" or "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch" apply more generally, but do not say anything directly about entropy.

_____________________________

"My object in all arguments is not to make any preconceived opinion of mine seem right, but merely to discover and establish the truth, whatever the truth may be."

-- HP Lovecraft, letter to Robert E. Howard 7/27-28/34
Post #: 11
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 11:50:19 AM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

Although there are several different formulations of the Second Law, they are all equivalent. The one relevant to drmark's remark is:

"The entropy of an isolated system which is not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium."

Other formulations of the second law, such as "heat flows from hot to cool" or "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch" apply more generally, but do not say anything directly about entropy.


Restatements of the 2nd law do nothing to change the fact that application of energy to a system is irrelevant if that energy isn't utilized in a way that allows it to do work.

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 12
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 12:34:06 PM   
essentialsaltes


Posts: 1062
Joined: 10/14/2007
From: Inglewood, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud
Restatements of the 2nd law do nothing to change the fact that application of energy to a system is irrelevant if that energy isn't utilized in a way that allows it to do work.


A parcel of air will do work on its surroundings when energy is applied to it. I don't see how this is a stumbling block for either biological life or evolution.

_____________________________

"My object in all arguments is not to make any preconceived opinion of mine seem right, but merely to discover and establish the truth, whatever the truth may be."

-- HP Lovecraft, letter to Robert E. Howard 7/27-28/34
Post #: 13
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 12:43:40 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

A parcel of air will do work on its surroundings when energy is applied to it. I don't see how this is a stumbling block for either biological life or evolution.


But what is at issue is how a 'parcel of air' (or any unguided application of energy) will act on it's surroundings. Obviously a tornado can rearrange things, but this application of energy is unlikely to result in a more ordered structure or system.

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 14
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 1:59:12 PM   
Veritas

 

Posts: 504
Joined: 4/19/2005
Status: offline
If I go to the beach and build a sand castle, do you think I have violated the Second Law of Thermodynamics?
Post #: 15
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 2:01:28 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

If I go to the beach and build a sand castle, do you think I have violated the Second Law of Thermodynamics?


Not at all, because I have employed my mind to utilize machinery to put energy to work to organize a structure.

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 16
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 2:29:46 PM   
essentialsaltes


Posts: 1062
Joined: 10/14/2007
From: Inglewood, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

A parcel of air will do work on its surroundings when energy is applied to it. I don't see how this is a stumbling block for either biological life or evolution.


But what is at issue is how a 'parcel of air' (or any unguided application of energy) will act on it's surroundings. Obviously a tornado can rearrange things, but this application of energy is unlikely to result in a more ordered structure or system.


Snowflakes and crystals and lipid bilayers become more ordered at the expense of the entropy of their surroundings. They don't form everywhere and anywhere, so in that sense they are 'unlikely', but when the right conditions are met, their formation is essentially unavoidable.

_____________________________

"My object in all arguments is not to make any preconceived opinion of mine seem right, but merely to discover and establish the truth, whatever the truth may be."

-- HP Lovecraft, letter to Robert E. Howard 7/27-28/34
Post #: 17
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 3:33:38 PM   
Veritas

 

Posts: 504
Joined: 4/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

If I go to the beach and build a sand castle, do you think I have violated the Second Law of Thermodynamics?


Not at all, because I have employed my mind to utilize machinery to put energy to work to organize a structure.

You were fine as far as "Not at all". The Second Law of Thermodynamics makes no allowances for a mind. Entropy increases whether there is a mind involved or not.
Post #: 18
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 4:25:09 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

You were fine as far as "Not at all". The Second Law of Thermodynamics makes no allowances for a mind. Entropy increases whether there is a mind involved or not.


So is the building of a sand castle an increase in entropy, or a decrease?

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 19
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 5:16:17 PM   
essentialsaltes


Posts: 1062
Joined: 10/14/2007
From: Inglewood, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

You were fine as far as "Not at all". The Second Law of Thermodynamics makes no allowances for a mind. Entropy increases whether there is a mind involved or not.


So is the building of a sand castle an increase in entropy, or a decrease?


Your phrasing is apposite. The building process (like just about any process) results in an increase in entropy of the universe.

_____________________________

"My object in all arguments is not to make any preconceived opinion of mine seem right, but merely to discover and establish the truth, whatever the truth may be."

-- HP Lovecraft, letter to Robert E. Howard 7/27-28/34
Post #: 20
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 6:04:07 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

Your phrasing is apposite. The building process (like just about any process) results in an increase in entropy of the universe.


Sure; but the castle represents a more ordered system than it did previously.

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 21
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 6:38:52 PM   
essentialsaltes


Posts: 1062
Joined: 10/14/2007
From: Inglewood, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

Your phrasing is apposite. The building process (like just about any process) results in an increase in entropy of the universe.


Sure; but the castle represents a more ordered system than it did previously.


Yes, and if you kick over a sand castle, it becomes less ordered.
And if a raindrop freezes into a snowflake, it becomes more ordered.
And if a snowflake melts into a raindrop, it becomes less ordered.

So we have established that the entropy of a non-isolated system can either increase or decrease.

Thus, getting back a bit closer to the OP, evolution does not require a suspension of this 'law' of entropy.

_____________________________

"My object in all arguments is not to make any preconceived opinion of mine seem right, but merely to discover and establish the truth, whatever the truth may be."

-- HP Lovecraft, letter to Robert E. Howard 7/27-28/34
Post #: 22
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 7:20:29 PM   
Veritas

 

Posts: 504
Joined: 4/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jhud

quote:

You were fine as far as "Not at all". The Second Law of Thermodynamics makes no allowances for a mind. Entropy increases whether there is a mind involved or not.


So is the building of a sand castle an increase in entropy, or a decrease?

The Second Law of Thermodynamics allows for a local decrease in entropy, provided there is an equal or greater increase in entropy elsewhere.

When you consider the builder and the sand, the net result of the building of a sand castle is an increase in entropy. As essentialsaltes said, evolution does not require a suspension of any of the Laws of Thermodynamics.
Post #: 23
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 7:55:10 PM   
iluvatar


Posts: 1964
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmark

quote:

What laws of nature would those be and in which cases does it suit us for them to be inconstant?
The most obvious one is entropy which must be suspended by evolutionists for life to evolve more complex forms over zillions of years. And no, I won't be responding to the tired old "closed/open system" debate if you wish to raise it.


Ok, if you won't accept the major problem with that argument, what other laws qualify?

-Dan.

_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 24
RE: Uniformitarianism - 8/20/2008 10:30:12 PM   
Jhud


Posts: 7785
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
quote:

Yes, and if you kick over a sand castle, it becomes less ordered.
And if a raindrop freezes into a snowflake, it becomes more ordered.
And if a snowflake melts into a raindrop, it becomes less ordered.

So we have established that the entropy of a non-isolated system can either increase or decrease.

Thus, getting back a bit closer to the OP, evolution does not require a suspension of this 'law' of entropy.


Not so fast there hoss.

A snowflake's crystalline structure may be the product of a localized decrease in entorpy, but a sandcastle is not - it's the product of the application of intelligence utlizing machinery to do work. The question ID asks of course, is whether there a difference in terms of the sorts of structures that result from either situation. What we need to know is, with all the energy continually being applied to beaches around the world, why don't sandcastles regularly arise as is the case wiuth snowflakes?

_____________________________

Jack

It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first..
- Ronald Reagan
Post #: 25
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Science & Origins >> Uniformitarianism
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


iBelieve Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

iBelieve.com is a proud member of the Salem Web Network of sites including:

CCMmagazine.com | ChristianJobs.com | ChurchStaffing.com | Crosscards.com | CrossDaily.com | Crosswalk.com | LightSource.com | OnePlace.com | SermonSearch.com | TheFish.com | XulonPress.com | YouthWorkerJournal.com
Enjoy the websites of these iBelieve.com Sponsors:

Bibles.com | BibleLeague.org | ChristianBook.com | EHarmony.com | Gospel for Asia | LifewayStores.com | Campus Crusade for Christ | Townhall.com | Billygraham.org

© Copyright 2006, iBelieve.com. All rights reserved.

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI